If you ask a homeowner or even many fresh engineers what type of concrete is used in a footing or slab, the most common answer is just “concrete.” Yet on site, two very important types are used repeatedly: plain cement concrete (PCC) and reinforced cement concrete (RCC). Understanding the difference between them is crucial for both safety and cost control.
Think of PCC and RCC like two cousins in the same family. Both are made from cement, sand, aggregate, and water, but RCC has an extra superpower: steel reinforcement. This one difference completely changes where and how each type should be used in a structure.
What Is Plain Cement Concrete (PCC)?
Plain cement concrete, often simply called PCC, is concrete with no steel reinforcement. It is made by mixing cement, fine aggregate (sand), coarse aggregate, and water in specific proportions to get a workable and durable mix. Common site mixes like 1:2:4 or 1:3:6 (cement : sand: aggregate) are typical for PCC, especially in non‑structural applications.
PCC is strong in compression but very weak in tension or bending. That is why it is used mostly where only compressive loads act, and there is little risk of significant bending, such as below foundations, as a levelling course, or as a protective layer separating structural concrete from soil or moisture.
Common uses of PCC include:
- Blinding/levelling layer below footings and raft foundations.
- Base layer for floors and pavements.
- Simple non‑structural elements like garden paths, small drains, or boundary walls.
What Is Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC)?
Reinforced cement concrete (RCC) is essentially PCC combined with steel bars, wires, or mesh. The concrete handles compressive forces, while the steel bars carry tensile and bending stresses. Together, they behave as a composite material capable of resisting compression, tension, shear, and bending, which is why RCC forms the backbone of modern structural systems.
Because of this combined strength, RCC is used in all major load‑bearing elements in a building or infrastructure project. Typical RCC components include beams, slabs, columns, footings, retaining walls, water tanks, bridges, and high‑rise frames. RCC also performs better under shocks and earthquakes when properly designed and detailed as per codes.
PCC vs RCC: Key Differences (Side-by-Side)
Here is a clear comparison of the difference between plain cement concrete and reinforced cement concrete:
| Parameter | PCC (Plain Cement Concrete) | RCC (Reinforced Cement Concrete) |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | Cement, sand, coarse aggregate, and water only. | Cement, sand, coarse aggregate, water, and steel reinforcement (rebars/mesh). |
| Strength behaviour | Strong in compression, very weak in tension and bending. | Strong in compression (concrete) and tension/bending (steel). |
| Load-bearing capacity | Suitable for non‑load‑bearing or lightly loaded areas only. | Designed for load‑bearing structural members with high strength demand. |
| Typical uses | Levelling course, flooring base, pavements, simple non‑structural works. | Beams, slabs, columns, footings, retaining walls, bridges, water tanks, high‑rise frames. |
| Durability and cracking | Good in compression but prone to cracking under tension or uneven settlement. | More durable and crack‑resistant when properly detailed and cured; steel controls crack widths. |
| Construction complexity | Simple: formwork (if needed), mixing, placing, finishing, and curing. | More complex: reinforcement cutting/bending/placing, cover blocks, vibration, and careful curing. |
| Cost | Lower initial cost due to absence of steel and simpler labour. | Higher initial cost because of steel, skilled labour, and more workmanship. |
| Design requirement | Often used with nominal mixes or basic guidelines; no rebar design. | Requires structural design as per codes (IS, ACI, etc.) for safe reinforcement and section sizing. |
Once you see the side‑by‑side table, it becomes clear: PCC is a support and protection material, while RCC is the main structural skeleton.
When to Use PCC in Construction
PCC is your go‑to choice when you need a strong, level, and durable base, but you are not relying on that layer to act as a main structural member. For example, below an isolated footing, a 75–100 mm thick PCC layer is often provided to create a clean, level platform and to keep the structural concrete safe from direct contact with soil and groundwater.
Typical situations where PCC is preferred:
- Base concrete for spread footings, combined footings, and raft foundations.
- Levelling course below ground floor slabs and tiles.
- Footpaths, garden walkways, and light‑duty pavements.
- Small non‑load‑bearing elements like steps, drains, or simple platforms.
In these cases, using RCC would unnecessarily increase cost because the section is not expected to resist significant bending or tensile stress.
When to Use RCC in Construction
RCC is mandatory wherever the member has to resist bending, tension, or heavy loads. A slab spanning between beams, a column carrying storey loads, or a beam over an opening are classic examples where plain concrete would crack badly if no steel were provided. RCC ensures safety, serviceability, and durability under these real‑world stresses.
Typical situations where RCC is essential:
- Beams and slabs in residential, commercial, and industrial buildings.
- Columns, plinth beams, lintels, and staircases.
- Retaining walls, water tanks, and overhead reservoirs.
- Bridges, flyovers, tunnels, and high‑rise structural frames.
In seismic zones, RCC design becomes even more important because ductile detailing of steel helps the structure dissipate energy during earthquakes.
Real-Life Example: A Small House
Imagine you are constructing a simple G+1 home. The soil is average, and the architect has given you standard drawings.
- Under each footing, you first place a thin PCC layer over compacted soil. This makes it easy to place reinforcement and footing concrete and prevents contamination of structural concrete with mud.
- The footing, column, plinth beam, and slab are all designed as RCC, with specified bar diameters, spacing, and cover. These members form the actual load path that carries the building safely to the ground.
If you accidentally used only PCC where RCC is needed—for example, a plain concrete slab without steel over a room—it would likely crack under the self‑weight and live load, especially near supports and mid‑span. Over time, this could lead to leakage, serviceability issues, and even safety concerns.
Advantages and Disadvantages of PCC and RCC
Advantages of PCC:
- Simple to design and execute; no steel detailing.
- Lower initial cost and less need for skilled labour.
- Provides a clean, stable base and protects structural elements from soil or moisture.
Disadvantages of PCC:
- Cannot resist significant tension or bending; cracks easily if loaded like a structural element.
- Not suitable for main load‑bearing members.
- More vulnerable to environmental and settlement‑induced cracking if misused.
Advantages of RCC:
- Excellent overall strength (compression + tension + bending).
- Highly versatile; can form beams, slabs, shells, curved elements, and complex shapes.
- Better durability and crack control when designed and executed correctly; widely used for critical structures.
Disadvantages of RCC:
- Higher cost due to steel and skilled manpower.
- Requires proper cover and maintenance; steel corrosion can reduce life if detailing/execution is poor.
- More complex quality control (rebar placement, compaction, curing).
FAQs on PCC vs RCC
- Which is stronger, PCC or RCC?
RCC is stronger overall because it combines the compressive strength of concrete with the tensile strength of steel, making it suitable for structural members, whereas PCC only handles compression effectively. - Can PCC be used instead of RCC in beams or slabs?
No. Beams, slabs, and other flexural members must be designed as RCC because they experience significant bending and tension; plain concrete would crack and fail prematurely. - Is PCC required below every footing?
PCC is commonly used below footings to create a level, clean base and to protect the structural concrete, though some designs may modify or minimize it based on soil and project requirement. - Why is RCC more expensive than PCC?
RCC costs more mainly because of steel reinforcement, additional formwork, skilled labour, and stricter quality control, but it delivers the strength and safety needed for structural elements. - Does RCC need more maintenance than PCC?
RCC in structural members requires periodic monitoring to prevent or detect issues like cracking and corrosion, while PCC in non‑structural applications usually needs less active maintenance but may require resurfacing if cracks appear.
Conclusion
The core difference between plain cement concrete and reinforced cement concrete is simple but powerful: PCC is unreinforced and mainly used as a protective, non‑structural layer, while RCC includes steel reinforcement and forms the load‑bearing skeleton of modern structures. When you understand where to use PCC and where RCC is mandatory, you design safer, more durable, and more economical projects.
For homeowners, students, and young engineers, the takeaway is clear: never treat all concrete as the same. Always follow structural drawings, consult relevant codes, and choose PCC or RCC based on the role that member must play in the overall structure.
Read This Also
How to Calculate Building Cost Before Construction: Your Step-by-Step Guide
Building Information Modeling (BIM) and 4D/5D BIM: The 2025 Guide
Artificial Intelligence in Civil Engineering: How Smart Infrastructure is Being Built
Advanced Materials for Civil Engineering: Trends & Applications